Wednesday, December 26, 2018

Dealing with Stock Market Declines


Dealing with Stock Market Declines 
(Original post 10-27-18)

Stock market declines are a dime a dozen.
Over the course of any year, there's likely to be one or two 10% to 19% declines, commonly called “corrections.” Every few years, there’s likely to be a 20% decline—the common definition of a “bear market.” Several times in your investing lifetime there will be a 30%, 40%, or 50% decline. Those are called “crashes” or “collapses.”

Think of all these events as "sales." The stock market is the only place where people run out of the store when there's a sale. Here's a great chart that shows how often and how big these sales are.

This is what markets do. And there’s a huge media enterprise that will tell you why it happens and “what to do next." All of it is hindsight-based and much of it contradictory; price always drives the media story line. 

Here's something else: If you want to talk about abnormal, look at 2017! It had one of the lowest annual drawdowns ever! No wonder people got surprised when normality returned in 2018.

So, here's what you need to do now: Nothing! (Unless you've been waiting for a sale.)

Take a minute to recall what a real financial plan looks like.

One, whatever money you think you might use in the next five years is kept behind a stock market firewall. It's in a checking account, savings account, bond funds, CDs, under a mattress, in a cookie jar. Return is irrelevant. Safety and liquidity are primary. This is the Five-Year Rule.

This gives you the freedom to care less about what happens in the stock market over any next five-year period because you always have the cash you need on hand. None of it hinges on what happens in the stock market. What a relief! You sleep well at night.

When stocks are rising, you’ll probably wonder why you have the Five-Year Rule. Ironically, that’s exactly  when you need it most. Effective money management is highly counter-intuitive.

Next. You have an Asset Allocation Policy with 5% or 10% guardrails, yes? That policy was put in place after a deliberate, unemotional assessment of your long-term needs and willingness to endure volatility. If the guardrails are violated, you re-balance back to the policy target.

That’s it. The Five-Year Rule and Asset Allocation. All the rest is entertainment.

In summary, know that we usually take the other side of our client's inclinations. When clients are enthusiastic with glee, we tend to be tentative and careful. When they are worried and frightened, we tend to be increasingly enthusiastic and optimistic.

Rising prices eventually bring risk and overvaluation; falling prices bring opportunity and set the stage for long-term profits. Of course, we accept good markets for what they are, but welcome with open wallets the seemingly less favorable.

An Even Bigger Picture
There's a wonderful set of graphics on stock market returns over long periods here
 

You might want to also go back and read the October 17th post below on Re-Thinking Risk.

Dealing with the News

Dealing with the News

The news. It happens everyday. It's relentless. It's entertaining. It's exciting. It's addictive. From a personal finance perspective, it's useless.

We give news a very short leash; not that we think it's "fake," but that media incentives are not aligned with yours or ours. For us, the value of news is that it tells us what the readers are probably thinking and feeling, and we can take that as a cue to do something different.

The essay, Avoid News, by Rolf Dobelli, first published in 2010, frames our attitude about news. A more recent echo by Bob French at the Retirement Researcher can be found here. 

A recent Vanguard paper concluded, "....our analysis of the relationship between economic surprises and asset returns yields two insights: First, the odds of successfully trading on surprises are low. Second, what can seem consequential in the short run is irrelevant to the long-term investor. Short-term surprises are quickly priced into long-term expectations..."

In the May, 2011, CONSIDERATIONS, I wrote, "There has never been a case where news changed the underlying trend of a major market index."  I'll stand by that.

Here's what you can do to sidestep the temptations and minimize the risks of consuming too much news:

1.  Just turn off or change the channel. Go for a walk.
2.  Spend less than you earn (unless you're already financially independent).
3.  Maintain sufficient liquidity. We call it the Five-Year Rule. This allows to ignore the day-to-day noise.
4.  Invest automatically. There's only one decision to make: When to begin.
5.  Pay attention to asset allocation. They have guardrails for a reason.
6.  Keep investment costs low. Costs subtract from what you get to keep.
7.  Stay the course. Robust strategies work in the long run. That's why they're called robust.
8.  Get out there and live your life! 

Q: But. But. But. I'm afraid a huge market crash is coming and I'm thinking about making my portfolio very conservative. What do you think?
A: In the short-term the market is random. For us, the "short-term" is anything less than five years. We use five years because, historically, cash is just as good as stocks in that span. Beyond five years, the odds start shifting in favor of stock investors. This also means that any money earmarked for spending in the next five years ought to be parked behind a stock market firewall. 

This consideration is part of setting a deliberate asset allocation policy, and asset allocation policy should be what drives portfolio decisions. It's the "portfolio power tool" that helps sidestep the hopes and fears that arise when we start "thinking about" stuff and reacting to news. 
11-25-18 

Q: Is there a way to invest in companies engaged in fighting climate change?
A: We believe climate change is a done deal-- that it is not reversible in our lifetimes-- and that the impacts are likely to become more frequent, serious, widespread, and long-lasting. (See the long-read references below.)

We believe it's impossible to confidently know ahead of time which companies might successfully deliver solutions for preventing, responding to, or adapting to climate change. Some existing companies will succeed, some won't. New companies will emerge; many will fail.
11-25-18

References:
Fourth National Climate Assessment (Added 12-1-18)
Global Inequalities in CO2 Emissions (Added 12-1-18)  
The 2018 Report of the Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change (Added 12-1-18) Registration Required (Free)
CO2 Emissions on the Rise (Added 12-1-18) 
A Kind of Dark Realism (Added 12-6-18)   

Q: How will trade tariffs impact our investments?
This is one of those newsy things that sounds so important. But the truth is, businesses and investment managers are already making adjustments that reflect their best estimates of the effects. They will continue to do so as trade news evolves. Hence, the effects are already being "priced in" to the market. So we don't see any edge or advantage to be earned by trying to guess what the impacts will be.
11-25-18

Q: You often make reference to a globally diversified portfolio. What is that, and how would a person have one if they wanted it?
A globally diversified portfolio contains simultaneous investments in four different asset classes: US stocks, Non-US stocks, US bonds, and Non-US bonds. 

Different investors will hold different proportions of each asset class, depending on their needs and prior asset allocation decisions. Know that investors all over the world tend to hold more of their own country's securities than others. This is called home country bias.

Globally diversified portfolios can easily and cheaply be constructed using four individual funds or ETFs, or by using just one or two balanced funds or ETFs.
12-2-18

Q: What are FANGs?
Actually, it's FAANGs. It's a media-inspired acronym for five leading technology stocks: Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google (Alphabet). Surely the definition of "technology stock" has been ridiculously modified. But that's what media does.

More importantly, four of those five companies (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Alphabet) are among the Top 10 in market value of the S&P500, and together, all five account for about 12% of the S&P500's total market value. So, what happens to these stocks has an impact on the 500. 
11-25-18